Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) By vote of the U.S. Senate
B) By vote of the U.S. House of Representatives
C) By vote of both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives
D) By early common law
E) By executive proclamation
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Search warrant
B) Subpoena warrant
C) Search authorization form
D) Seek warrant
E) Review authorization
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No, the legislation does not treat paint suppliers from out of state any differently than paint suppliers within the state and would be proper exercise of a state's police powers.
B) No, the ordinance violates the First Amendment not the dormant commerce clause.
C) No, this is a federal commerce clause violation and does not deal with any state interests.
D) Yes, this is a violation of the dormant commerce clause.
E) Yes, this is a violation but a federal court would most likely find that the commerce clause was violated instead of the dormant commerce clause.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Searching digital information on a cell phone with a warrant.
B) Using a drug sniffing dog during a routine traffic stop with a warrant.
C) Using a drug sniffing dog during a routine traffic stop without a warrant.
D) Bringing a drug sniffing dog into someone's private home with a warrant.
E) Bringing a drug sniffing dog onto someone's front porch without a warrant.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) For Leaf because he has an absolute right to free speech under the First Amendment.
B) For Leaf because the rational-basis test applies.
C) For Leaf because he did not use any lewd, profane, or obscene words.
D) For Milo because the First Amendment does not protect defamatory speech.
E) For Milo, but only if Leaf also used fighting words.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) When law enforcement officials believe it is likely that the items sought will be removed before they can obtain a warrant.
B) Outside of normal working hours for a judge.
C) When they can show that the suspect who lives in the residence at issue has been in jail previously.
D) When they can show that a felony is involved.
E) When they can show that they have heightened probable cause.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If a police officer believes it is likely that items sought will be removed from the premises, the officer must obtain an Urgent Search Warrant prior to the search.
B) A government official must always obtain a search warrant prior to engaging in a search of corporate property.
C) A warrantless search is permissible when an industry has a long history of pervasive regulation, such as a search authorized by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act.
D) A police officer must always obtain a search warrant before searching a vehicle for stolen goods.
E) The rule on "unreasonable search and seizure" only applies to individual citizens, not corporations.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Short Answer
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) six
B) five
C) four
D) three
E) two
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The officer was incorrect, and Sam had the right to remain silent based on his constitutional protection against self-incrimination.
B) The officer was correct that Sam had no right to remain silent, and there has never been a constitutional right entitling a defendant to remain silent.
C) The officer was correct that Sam had no right to remain silent because while at one time there was a constitutional right entitling a defendant to remain silent, that right was repealed by constitutional amendment.
D) The officer was correct, and Sam had no right to remain silent because the right against self-incrimination only protects against crimes involving physical harm to another.
E) The officer was partially correct because while Sam had a right to remain silent about other crimes, he did not have the right to remain silent about the drugs found in the initial search.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The U.S. Supreme Court has said that the U.S. Constitution does not provide any right to privacy.
B) The U.S. Supreme Court has found that U.S. citizens have a right to privacy based upon the U.S. Constitution.
C) The U.S. Constitution specifically provides for a right to privacy within the Second Amendment.
D) The U.S. Constitution specifically provides for a right to privacy within the Sixth Amendment.
E) The U.S. Supreme Court has found that U.S. citizens have a right to privacy based upon the U.S. Constitution, and the U.S. Constitution specifically provides for a right to privacy within the Sixth Amendment.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Procedural due process
B) Substantive due process
C) Independent due process
D) The prohibition against taking
E) The prohibition against pervasive regulation
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Bill of Rights
B) The first three amendments to the Constitution
C) The first three articles to the Constitution.
D) The Tenth Amendment.
E) The Preamble to the Constitution.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The privileges and immunites clause
B) The dormant commerce clause
C) The preemption doctrine
D) The full faith and credit clause
E) The commerce clause
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) First
B) Third
C) Fourth
D) Sixth
E) Tenth
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Rational basis scrutiny
B) Intermediate scrutiny
C) Strict scrutiny
D) Popular scrutiny
E) Systemic scrutiny
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 90
Related Exams