A) If Rob would have contacted Wendy and received her approval to extend an offer on a home that did not meet all of her requirements.
B) If Rob would have informed the seller of Wendy's name and contact information.
C) If Rob would have informed the seller the home did not meet all of the principal's requirements.
D) If Rob would have contacted Wendy and told her that he was going to make an offer on a home that did not meet all of her requirements.
E) Rob's offer was authorized.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Under the time and place theory, the employee would not have caused harm at that exact time and place had it not been for the employer.
B) The employer benefits from the work of the employee, therefore, the employer should also be responsible for any harm the employee caused.
C) The employer did know or should have known his or her employee would cause harm.
D) The employer typically has more money to pay for the harm.
E) The employer should have better hiring practices.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Night Club would not be liable because Trevor was not acting within the scope of his employment.
B) Night Club would not be liable because Trevor's acts were not criminal or tortious.
C) Night Club would be liable because Trevor was negligent when he hit Pat with the chair.
D) Night Club would be liable because it should have anticipated an injury similar to Pat's based on the type of business it conducts.
E) Night Club would not be liable because Zack started the fight.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Fulfillment of purpose
B) Change in circumstances
C) Mutual agreement by the parties
D) Renunciation by the agent
E) Agency coupled with interest
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The employer was not liable because it had an anti-discrimination policy in place.
B) The plaintiff successfully stated her claim for hostile work environment and was granted a $1,000,000 award in damages.
C) The case was dismissed because the employer launched a thorough internal investigation, which revealed no harassment had occurred.
D) The case was dismissed because there was an anti-discrimination policy in place, the employer conducted a thorough investigation of the claims, and there was no evidence the alleged harassment derived from the supervisory relationship.
E) The employer was liable because it failed to look into applicants' background before hiring.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Simone would likely be held liable for negligent hiring.
B) Regardless of whether she did anything to directly cause injury to Ryan, Simone would likely be held liable on a strict liability theory because her customer was injured.
C) Simone would likely be held liable for breach of customer warranty.
D) Simone would likely be required to split the damages with Jamal because Jamal was her employee.
E) There is no theory on which Simone could be held liable for her own conduct in this situation.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Out on their own
B) Rebelling against the master
C) Pleasure before work
D) Deviation for the employer's needs
E) Frolic of his own
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) special power of attorney
B) general power of attorney
C) encompassing power of attorney
D) detailed power of attorney
E) employment power of attorney
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 81 - 90 of 90
Related Exams