A) The window washer was entitled to workers' compensation as an employee.
B) The window washer was entitled to a recovery in tort based on the inherently dangerous activity at issue and the defendant's failure to take sufficient precautions.
C) The window washer was entitled to recovery for breach of contract.
D) The window washer was not entitled to recover because he took insufficient precautions for his own safety.
E) The window washer was entitled to no recovery based on his status as an independent contractor.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The employer can be liable.
B) The employer is not liable because as a matter of public policy, a person is singularly liable for his or her torts.
C) In order to give the employer a chance to evaluate the employee, the employer is liable only if the employee has worked for the employer for at least thirty days.
D) In order to give the employer a chance to evaluate the employee, the employer is liable only if the employee has worked for the employer for at least seven days.
E) In order to give the employer a chance to evaluate the employee, the employer is liable only if the employee has worked for the employer for at least six months.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That because no extrinsic evidence existed to clarify the meaning of the power of attorney, the transfer was invalid.
B) That because no extrinsic evidence existed to clarify the meaning of the power of attorney, the transfer was valid.
C) That because the power of attorney did not specifically give the wife the power to transfer property into the trust, the transfer was invalid.
D) That based on extrinsic evidence showing the decedent's intent, the power of attorney included the power to transfer the property.
E) That based on extrinsic evidence showing the decedent's intent, the power of attorney did not include the power to transfer the property.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Wendy should sue the seller for breach of implied warranty.
B) Wendy should sue Rob for breach of implied warranty.
C) Wendy should sue the seller for breach of contract.
D) Wendy should sue Rob for breach of contract.
E) Wendy does not have a valid cause of action against the seller or Rob.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Jasmine is not personally bound because she was acting on behalf of Carlos.
B) Jasmine is personally bound unless she can establish that Sarah would not have sold her the lot if she had known that Carlos was involved; and the contract is, therefore, void.
C) Jasmine is personally bound unless she can establish that Carlos has the funds with which to pay Sarah.
D) Jasmine is not personally bound unless Carlos has legally filed for bankruptcy.
E) Jasmine is personally bound.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Chapter IV of the Agency Relationship Law
B) Chapter VII of the Employment Relationship
C) Article VI of the European Union Regulations
D) Article VII of the European Union Regulations
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The principal is liable on the contract because it is unconscionable to exclude a principal from a contract.
B) The principal is liable on the contract only if the principal is an unidentified principal.
C) The principal is liable on the contract only if the principal is a partially disclosed principal.
D) The principal is liable on the contract unless the principal gave the agent authority in writing to make the agreement with the third party.
E) The principal is not liable on the contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) but the principal can also be liable.
B) only if the agent was on a mission for an identified principal or a partially disclosed principal.
C) regardless of both the classification and the liability of the principal.
D) but can also seek indemnification from the principal.
E) only if the principal had the agent sign a waiver.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) When the principal is undisclosed.
B) When the principal is partially disclosed.
C) When the principal is disclosed.
D) When the principal is disclosed or partially disclosed.
E) When the principal is partially undisclosed.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, by fulfillment of purpose.
B) No, John must put the termination in writing.
C) No, John must put the termination in form of a publication.
D) Yes, by lapse of time.
E) Yes, by mutual agreement of the parties.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Partially disclosed principal
B) Identified principal
C) Disclosed principal
D) Partially identified principal
E) Undisclosed principal
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) the principal ratifies the agreement.
B) the principal is an unidentified principal.
C) the principal is a partially disclosed principal.
D) the principal is expressly barred from disaffirming the agreement.
E) a court finds that principal should be bound.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The employer knew or should have known of the employee's harm and failed to stop it.
B) The employer outsourced its human resources overseas and failed to follow traditional U.S. human resources procedures.
C) The employer failed to conduct a semi-annual training on appropriate workplace behavior.
D) The employer failed to monitor its employees.
E) The employer had bad hiring practices.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) As a matter of law, Sira's Sandwiches is not liable because Elliott was acting on his own behalf.
B) As a matter of law, Sira's Sandwiches is not liable because only property damage is involved.
C) As a matter of law, Sira's Sandwiches is liable because a company is liable for any torts committed by an employee during working hours.
D) Whether or not Sira's Sandwiches is liable depends on whether Elliott's acts are seen as substantial departure from his work.
E) Whether or not Sira's Sandwiches is liable depends on how long Elliott has worked for the company.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) reimbursement
B) indemnification
C) indemnitee
D) retainers
E) proceeds
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No, because Tiffany is not an employee and should have known better.
B) No, because companies are not liable for acts of an independent contractor.
C) No, because the independent contractor did not have to obey the company.
D) Yes, because Delorian directed Tiffany to commit the tort.
E) Yes, because the company should have known the independent contract would do what it asked.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 90
Related Exams